Before we start, the link the article here
source
That's a big fat logic fail, just try imagine how much forest would have existed then. Now imagine how many trees could have been cut down, without any modern technology. Anyways, I'll continue with this bs err I mean article.
source
No shit? So (large) farming changes soil nutrient levels. Well thanks for the knowledge bomb captain obvious
Well of course! Well managed farmland. If you are doing nothing but monoculture (like today's farming) you are going to have some real consequences to the nutrient levels. But is that how they were farming? What was their level of crop knowledge then?
There are many things that affect the soil, plenty of crops that fix nitrogen back into the soil. They also sequester carbon so what's your point?
Look obviously with soil on which you are growing food, is going to have shifting nutrient levels each year. But that's not going to affect all the soil in the land. Are these animal bones they collected, animals that only ate plants on the farm land? Really? Am I missing something here?
This is nothing but a desperate attempt to stir up 'legitimacy' for climate change scam in order to further push Agenda2030.
source
@corbettreport "What is the average global temperature?"
Climate Control Knob
