I think we should revert to my idea from 2015: Netbits...
...Netbits would the decentralized ledger project and the currency name. Most users would only come to know the name from the name of the tokens they receive.
It was interesting to revisit that part of the thread
While Netbits does lose out on ultimate uniqueness, it does seem to fulfill the function of being catchy, while at the same time is acceptable in a "serious" sense; coinmarketcap etc, and expresses its links to the internet and the token. On this score, it will probably be difficult to beat, considering how many good names are already taken. And it's only two syllables.
I tried thinking of names that begin with "Bits" rather than end with it, but the cupboard seemed to be bare of original ones. All too easy to get corny and/or desperate.
The mass market website is likely to be one of the more popular DApps, so could be Uncommons, Bleep, Keeper, Immortal and/or Oodles. Users will arrive at one of those mass market DApps, and when they join they will receive some tokens. Many third parties can produce DApps, so eventually there may not be one monolithic name which presents to the mass market of users.
Right, I see. So it's likely to be quite flexible in its evolution.
Currently I like Uncommons for the Wikipedia, Medium, and Reddit clones1. For a gaming portal I like Oodles or Immortal. For a Youtube clone, I like Uncommons, Bleep or Oodles. Keeper or Stor could be for a Dropbox clone for file archival and hosting.
Well for me personally, I'm with you for Uncommons as the Wiki/Medium/Reddit clones, then Immortal for gaming, with Keeper for archiving. I'm undecided between Bleep and Oodles for the Youtube clone (depending on how important the emphasis should be placed on communicating its uncensored nature). Out of the two I'd go for the combined catchiness and allusion to cornucopia of Oodles.
RE: Name YOUR decentralized social network?