This video caught my attention because it was played as a paid advert on yo.utube.
William Lane Craig is paying good money to force people to watch this propaganda which William Lane Craig believes supports his version of Christianity (spoiler alert, it does nothing of the sort).
It makes the bald-assertion that "a maximally great god" is a "coherent concept" without any supporting definitions or logical structure to support such a claim.
And yet, it is eager to show the "incoherence" of a maximally great pizza, again, without any supporting definitions or logical structure to support such a claim.
It's a pet project of mine to point out that DEISM = ATHEISM, and I find it interesting that Christians seem to think that "the ontological argument" somehow "supports" their case(???).
By the way, I believe it's worth mentioning that an ontological argument is basically a bald-assertion.
I define a word, and then assert that word represents something that "exists". End of ontological argument.
"A maximally great god" could be any god. It could be Brahman, it could be Ein Sof, it could be The Great Spirit, it could be Magnum Mysterium (the unknowable, NOUMENON).
Nothing about "a maximally great god" suggests "YHWH" specifically.
I'm just trying to make it perfectly clear there is no straight line between DEISM (the ontological argument) and any particular specific god or gods.
RE: DEISM = ATHEISM