Eh, I'm pretty sure the original intent, the original use-case for government was to adjudicate disputes between citizens and to provide public roads and protect public resources like water and to protect citizens from foreign invasion and to protect property rights so the powerful (ranchers and or railroads) can't simply take your land by force.
The government should act as a referee.
Now imagine if you had a sports league where the most powerful teams openly advocated eliminating referees.
wHY do you think they would do that??
Or if they promised referee's well paying jobs when they retired from being referees.
wHY do you think they would do that??
Or if they managed to get their former coaches and or other personnel and or their relatives installed as referees to officiate their own games.
wHY do you think they would do that??
Imagine if certain teams sponsored extravagant "educational" seminars for referees that emphasized how great their players were and how much their team contributes to community spirit and local business, especially when they win games. When we win, our whole town wins!
THE "PROBLEM" ISN'T THE REFEREES THEMSELVES, OR EVEN THE IDEA OF REFEREES IN GENERAL.
THE "PROBLEM" IS CORRUPTION.
Government As Referee Framework (GARF)
ZOMBIEBASICTRAINING
+proHUMAN +proFAMILY
Your scathing critique is requested.