On number 7, I would argue saying the reward pool should not treat shared videos, posts, Twitter Tweets, Facebook posts, shared photos, shared memes, links, random things shared from random websites, forums, emails, etc, etc, differently. Don't treat them differently and let the people decide. But perhaps if not enough people upvote a shared item, then perhaps resource credits, the manna, the Hive Power, should go down. Perhaps punish people that way in order to limit spam, abuse, etc. But I believe in rewarding people for sharing. Besides, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc, they make billions to trillions of dollars letting us share things on their platforms. Why can't we do the same? Like, is it ok when they do it and not ok when alternative tech do it?
RE: History of Hive COMMUNITIES and what is next (From my perspective)