But content can cost money to host online. Meaning it can be tough to an extent. Text costs less money. Video can be bulkier. So, I agree that we should always try to help content creators and that is why I like things like IPFS, Bit Torrent, P2P, etc. Not to say we can't try at least to improve Steem, Gab, Minds, Bitchute, Brighteon, Banned.video, etc. I like decentralization. I love Bitcoin. I love witnesses. People should be paid to help host content online. Perhaps, Steem could find ways to pay people to host content, to be witnesses so to speak. I know Steemit has witnesses. But I feel that there might not be as many Steem witnesses as there are Bitcoin miners.
RE: What is Steem's Best Path to Adoption?