is Steemit, Inc. going to stick by their story that HF21 was a "good" thing?
Of course!
Think of how long they prepared for the improvements.
For instance:
They removed the button showing how many readers we have...so that hopefully the number of votes (up or down) make us feel we are being read
When we comment or reply, we no longer see the range of comments (unless we have the time and do not mind lots of extra clicks to read from the original, which shows all), we only see the one reply...so we quickly give up, thinking nobody else was interested in debating the matter. Just as well, since everyone with an SP of less than 2,000 cannot vote on comments, since they just get sent back to the reward pool, making more Steem available for the big voters
They reduced the waiting period for post voting, thus ensuring everyone just rushes in to vote, not having to or being able to take the time to read and make an evaluation...so the crappier our articcles or posts, the better, as we do not waste time on creating posts that take effort and time.
Curators - does the word mean or suggest that they are there to study the posts and reward the best? Actually, what it means...no, surely this would be false...I mean, is it not a fact that most of the curators with their tails...er...trails, are witnesses? No, it would be baseless of us to even suggest that witnesses changed the creator/curator sharing of rewards because they stood to gain?
Has everyone noticed that the 'team' are doing their best to accustom us to the fact that they love lying, so that we do not take exception to it? How many times a day do they lie? I wish they would get more inventive, as I find it very boring being told a number of times per day that the page I want does not exist...and then it opens.
No, no, I do not want to make anyone look or feel bad, so I'll let it go... bye, bye.
RE: .