RE: RE: Untangling the Gordian Knot that is Steem Ethics
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Untangling the Gordian Knot that is Steem Ethics

RE: Untangling the Gordian Knot that is Steem Ethics

From a free market perspective, it would be better to just upvote in the same way we buy stuff. I don't downvote. And upvoting is like betting on the horses that may win. The ability to upvote and downvote might be like double betting where you create a win win situation if you are able to bet on both sides in a scheme to always win. Not saying we have that with Steem. I believe in supply and demand.

It would be better if we were focused only on upvoting what we liked as opposed to also, at the same time, trying to police the place in trying to minimize posts that might earn too much money subjectively. Having the freedom to do both is what we have currently it seems. I know some people might like that freedom to do that. But people don't go to McDonald's and steal money from them because they earned too much money, right? Facebook earns billions of dollars each year from us. Can we go and downvote Facebook for making too money? They don't share that money with us. That's sad. But I would not downvote Facebook.

H2
H3
H4
Upload from PC
Video gallery
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
4 Comments