RE: RE: The 0.01 Percent Art Market Is A Ponzi Scheme
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The 0.01 Percent Art Market Is A Ponzi Scheme

RE: The 0.01 Percent Art Market Is A Ponzi Scheme

Michael Jordan Art?

But what do you want to do about it? How is it a Ponzi Scheme? Are people being encouraged to buy overpriced art that they think they can resell but then can't? Are people being conned and lied to about getting rich? Are too many artists unable to make a living because of the 0.01 percent of the ultra-rich who are like monopolies in dominating in being like the Michael Jordan of art?

Money

There are a bunch of problems. First, artists can struggle to make a living. There are a bunch of factors that play into that. I'm a wannabe artist. I took a bunch of art classes in high school. Second, money has been excessively centralized through world banks, the Not-Federal Federal Reserve, Rothschild, Soros, Rockefeller, etc. Third, buying and selling art could be a form of gambling. I'm not necessarily against gambling, but it can become a very bad habit. It is a bad habit for some people. I love free market capitalism but I hate crony capitalism and other things. I love art.

H2
H3
H4
Upload from PC
Video gallery
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
2 Comments