I was reading one such (Rockefeller foundation supported) article in the Guardian which speaks to the new city boom and reminded me of my previous observations around agenda 21/2030. Within my post I observed that:
The agenda seeks total control of the human domain and rights of travel and self-determinism. The gradual removal of people from the countryside and into smart city (see the rise of the "virtuous" tiny home movement) high-density housing. The end of private ownership and (I believe) the insidious erosion of the family unit.
The UN’s own figures forecast that by 2050 2/3 of the world’s population will be living in cities, this information is further echoed in the above article. It's not too difficult to envisage that after some form of financial crash people could be pushed towards the city and promises of help. My guess is that many will lose their houses and that eventually a perceived "virtuous" private enterprise (ultimately connected to the same power structure) will start buying up the (relatively) cheap housing stock, bankrupt housing associations, building tiny houses in ever higher density and then renting them at an affordable (or subsidised) rate (with provisos). Mass private ownership will become relegated to history and property will become increasingly centralised and under the jurisdiction of a governing body.
Equally, the cities are intended to be fully automated smart cities, with a strong emphasis on surveillance and control of the population. Increasingly new builds will be smart by design with the internet/wi-fi/sensors and microphones (that will be marketed as voice activated) built into their every wall/ceiling and floorspace, a google spy in every house. In the older cities, the houses will be retrofitted and with smart systems (like a cutting edge Alexa) built into their every aspect. The city of the future is intended to be one of bland corporate high street uniformity, a level playing ground (pay to play) system that only the technocratic/corporate behemoths can afford to play in. Equally, the rush towards the perceived safety of the city environment, could see the creation of shanty towns on their outskirts.
Moser says the money to be made is staggering – measured in the trillions of dollars. “It’s extremely lucrative,” she adds. “There are real estate and tech companies circling like sharks.” Source
Source
)
Our Smart City Future
We can now observe our smart city future being drawn into mainstream talking points, this is the first loop of the entrainment cycle. This Rockefeller cities sponsored Guardian article speaks to our intended smart city future. The concept revolves around removing human populations from 50% of the earth's landmass and into high-density city living.
There are now twice as many people as 50 years ago. But, as EO Wilson has argued, they can all survive – in cities Source
The concept was originally put forward by the biologist, theorist, and naturalist E.O Wilson. Again, I have no problem in accepting that Wilson may very well have the very best of intentions and some valid ideas. Equally, I also have no problem considering whether his concepts are being drawn into the broader narratives of our encroaching climatocracy. This system gathers power by controlling the narrative, if the narratives are aligned it doesn't need to control the individual. Indeed, it is worthy of note that Wilson was a Rockefeller University Lewis Thomas prize recipient for his similar themed letter to Thoreau.
Conclusion
Make no mistake; whilst we discuss, the cities of our future are being built and the cities of our past are being "regenerated". Ultimately regeneration (gentrification) is code for pushing all non-wealth out of the city center and into high-density housing on its periphery. In our favour is the fact that although the system architects are very clever, their sycophantic button pushers are often dogmatic and lack the ability to think on their feet. If we know the intent and the methodology, they can be taken off script/track and thus can be beaten.
Pentagon Video Warns of “Unavoidable” Dystopian Future for World’s Biggest Cities
I've already alluded to (and written about) a financial crash pushing people towards the cityscape, but what else could be a contributary factor? Why are the UN so emboldened in their belief that the future for humanity resides in city living? Personally, I believe that there is going to be a breakdown in the food chain and that people will be drawn towards the city out of sheer desperation. I believe this breakdown will occur due to the approaching solar minimum, but that the scene has been set to attach blame to a populace who will all too willingly surrender freedom for food and the false veneer of protection.
I feel that the best advice I can give anyone at this moment in time is to become as self-reliant as possible. If you can't already, then learn how to grow your own food. If you live in the city, reach out to neighbours or food co-operatives, now is the time to network, you do not want to be waiting in line for your next meal! Where possible, be nice to people and look out for one another, something tells me that we're going to need each other. Although (I feel) we're moving into an era of great challenge, our challenges often offer us our greatest opportunities.
Anyway I read the article with interest, so thought I'd briefly share some of the thoughts it inspired. I'm not going to be online very much until after the weekend and so any missed comments will be replied to upon my return. Thank you for reading!
One: The Fake Big Business Green Energy Revolution
Two: Green Phoenix Rising Part 1
Three: Green Phoenix Rising Part 2
Four: Green Phoenix Rising Part 3
Five: Ancient Timecycles On The Edge Of Tomorrow
Written by perceptualflaws
Gifs courtesy of giphy.com
Banner Gifs courtesy of @justcallmemyth
Source
