RE: RE: Lasse's Angels promotion campaign: Are you an attractive female that would like to make 5000 LASSECASH per post ones a week for 3 months? (Guaranteed, potentially much more if the price of LASSECASH goes up)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Lasse's Angels promotion campaign: Are you an attractive female that would like to make 5000 LASSECASH per post ones a week for 3 months? (Guaranteed, potentially much more if the price of LASSECASH goes up)

RE: Lasse's Angels promotion campaign: Are you an attractive female that would like to make 5000 LASSECASH per post ones a week for 3 months? (Guaranteed, potentially much more if the price of LASSECASH goes up)

Preference:

I would downvote flag something if I don't like it or whatever. But technically, specifically, I wouldn't downvote because it was over rewarded because I don't even know what over rewarded means. I mean, according to who? It's like the definition of hate speech or spam.

Perspective

It's like what is one person's garbage could be another person's treasure that might be priceless and therefore impossible to be over rewarded, if it is priceless. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Free Markets

In free markets, it is about supply and demand. So, an upvote could represent demand. Therefore, if there are more upvotes, then there is, in theory, more demand, and therefore perhaps more rewards or an over-reward or whatever we want to call it.

Freewill

Of course, we all have the freedom to upvote and downvote whatever we want for any reason. So, we can even say that we are downvoting what might be over-rewarded.

Hate Speech

We can also try to ban and remove hate speech and spam and guns and many things if we want. I wouldn't. I would simply downvote and say I'm downvoting because I hate it and not because it is like earning too much money.

Competition

I love money. I believe, if you make a lot of money, good for you. I'm not going to cry and say that you might be earning too much money. Why?

Subjective

Because that is a subjective argument. Like who decides who makes too much money? So, if Michael Jordan, Michael Jackson, Lady Gaga, Taylor Swift, or others were over rewarded by being paid too much, then we could try to boycott them and make videos about how we should stop paying them via going to their games, concerts, buying their music, etc.

Too Much

If people are making too much on Steemit, then I guess we could downvote them and we could make videos and write posts encouraging people to not upvote their content and to maybe even downvote their content. Therefore, I guess, you might be right that this was over rewarded. I just did a logic circle. I'm back to the beginning. Maybe I should just delete this comment. But I'm just saying it depends lol.

H2
H3
H4
Upload from PC
Video gallery
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
2 Comments