Watch on VidMe: https://vid.me/JAUX
Download PDF Notes: https://1drv.ms/b/s!As32ynv0LoaIht983jfGMKprUoJmZg
Watch the rest of my ongoing #PizzaGate Video Series: https://mes.fm/pizzagate-voat
Download These Notes: http://mes.fm/pizzagate
Subscribe via Email: http://mes.fm/subscribe
Donate: http://mes.fm/donate āŗ
Recap on Previous Parts
Part 1: Podesta / McCann connection still unresolved.
Part 2: ACORN controversy shows plausibility of government funded international child sex trafficking rings.
Part 3: Barack Obama lies about his connection to ACORN because of the negative ACORN publicity.
#PizzaGate Part 4
Topics to Cover:
- Current PizzaGate Trends.
- Mainstream Media Coverage of McCann / Podesta Connection.
- Revisiting the connection between McCann / Podesta Connection
NOTE: This video is long so if you want to skip to my summary and conclusions, you can skip towards the end of this video.
PizzaGate Google Search Trends
https://www.google.ca/trends/explore?date=today%203-m&q=pizzagate,fake%20news
Mainstream Media Coverage of McCann / Podesta Connection
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory
Pizzagate conspiracy theory
ā¦ and John Podesta and his brother Tony Podesta's alleged connection to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.[1]
Theorists claimed John and Tony Podesta kidnapped Madeleine McCann using police sketches which were, in fact, two sketches of the same suspect taken from the descriptions of two eye witnesses. Furthermore, the claim that the brothers were in Portugal at the time of the kidnapping was sourced only to Victurus Libertas, notable for, among other things, suggesting that the queen of England is a reptilian alien.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/10/business/media/pizzagate.html?_r=0
10 December 2016
Dissecting the #PizzaGate Conspiracy Theories
Claim: John and Tony Podesta personally kidnapped Madeleine McCann from her bed at a Portugal resort in 2007.
Another part of the conspiracy theory was a supposed link between the Podesta brothers and the child abduction case of Madeleine McCann on May 3, 2007. Two e-fit (electronic facial identification technique) photos released by British detectives were repeatedly used as evidence.
A conspiracy theory poster comparing the Podesta brothers and police sketches. This version has been edited to remove Madeleine McCannās image.
However, the two e-fits were based on descriptions of a single suspect by two witnesses, not two different suspects, a crucial detail that was left out.
According to The Guardian, the witnesses described the man as āwhite, aged between 20 and 40, with short brown hair, of medium build, medium height and clean shaven.ā In 2007, Tony Podesta was 64 and John Podesta was 58.
The information that the Podestas were in Portugal is solely sourced to āFBI Anon,ā quoted in Victurus Libertas, a conspiracy-minded news site that suggests, among other things, that the Titanic was deliberately sunk and that the queen of England is a reptilian alien.
http://www.snopes.com/tony-and-john-podesta-match-madeleine-mccann-police-sketches/
12 December 2016
Sketchy Connection
MOSTLY FALSE
WHAT'S TRUE: Taken out of context, two images of a single suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann appeared to resemble Tony and John Podesta.
WHAT'S FALSE: The "efits" circulated by police depicted one man, not two; the images were of a person of interest or witness, not a possible kidnapper.
Without the necessary context, the images to seem to resemble the brothers. However, that context is key in this case. The sketch depicts not two but one man, and that man was sought as a witness to the kidnapping (not necessarily a perpetrator of or accessory to it). The digitally generated images were released in October 2013, alongside renewed pleas from police to the public for any information in the cold McCann case:
Police have issued two efits that they believe are descriptions of the same man, who is now being sought as a priority by the British detectives leading the new McCann inquiry.
He was seen in the vicinity of the Praia da Luz resort in Portugal six years ago at the time that the three-year-old went missing. Despite numerous appeals for information over the years, the man has not come forward to talk to investigators in Portugal or Britain.
Descriptions of the suspect were given to the Portuguese inquiry by two witnesses after Madeleine disappeared.
It is true that some reports referenced the man (singular) as a "suspect," but it went on to list a number of factors that, again, did not ensure the rumor would stick:
The inquiry is focusing on 41 suspects and requests for assistance have been issued to 30 countries in a bid to identify and eliminate these people, 15 of whom are British. Crimewatch will feature other efits of individuals that the police would also like to trace ... [The depicted individual] was described by the witnesses as white, aged between 20 and 40, with short brown hair, of medium build, medium height and clean shaven.
John Podesta was 67 in December 2016, indicating he was between 58 and 59 at the time of McCann's disappearance; the man depicted was described as being between the ages of 20 and 40. While only 18 years separate 40 and 58, it would be incredibly difficult to mistake a 60-year-old man for a 20-year-old.
Some versions of the rumor claimed that John Podesta was in Portugal around the time of the incident, but referenced an e-mail about a trip which occurred several months after McCann vanished. In another version, Podesta was placed in Portugal at the time of the disappearance by an unnamed law enforcement source, information that without any supporting evidence was as implausible as it was unreliable.
Both the New York Times and Snopes article bring up the following claims:
- That the efits represents 1 suspect.
- The suspect was described as between 20 to 40 years old, which is too young to be the Podestas.
- Bring up some random conspiracy site stating unnamed sources saying Podesta's were in Portugal at the time of the reported disappearance.
The Snopes articles has the following additional claims:
- The efits don't represent a suspect, but while still claiming that some reports state he was a suspect??
WHAT'S FALSE: The "efits" circulated by police depicted one man, not two; the images were of a person of interest or witness, not a possible kidnapper.
It is true that some reports referenced the man (singular) as a "suspect,"ā¦
- Sited a claim that the Podesta's were in Portugal at the time but stated the Wikileaks email was dated several months after the reported disappearance.
They cited the following article for this claim:
http://truthfeed.com/breaking-bombshell-multiple-reports-tie-clintons-podesta- brothers-to-child-abduction-case/34348/
Archived Link: http://archive.is/BCWVA
7 November 2016
BREAKING BOMBSHELL : Multiple Reports Tie Clintonās Podesta Brothers to Child Abduction Case of Madeline McCann
The abduction occurred in Portugal, where Wikileaks emails show was a destination Podesta traveled to.
This site clearly never stated that this email shows the Podestas were in Portugal at the time but rather that Portugal was simply a travel destination for them.
Thus Snopes should remove this misleading claim of theirs.
Revisiting the McCann / Podesta Connection
In #PizzaGate Part 1 I brought up the following unanswered claims:
- John and Tony Podesta look identical to the eFits (including the mole on Tony's forehead).
- Wikileaks suggests that John Podesta may have purposely deleted many emails before May 4, 2007 (McCann was reported to be missing on May 3rd).
- On May 4, 2007 John Podesta's assistant Elizabeth Cooley sent an email on his behave through his own email account.
- John, Tony, and Elizabeth Cooley have not spoken publicly regarding their whereabouts and no news outlet bothered to ask them any questions.
- Until recently the mainstream media has been completely silent on this connection.
Also why were the efits were released in 2013, over 6 YEARS after McCann's disappearance?
Where the efits of a suspect or simply a person of interest?
14 October 2013
Crimewatch UK - October 2013 Madeleine Mccann Special
The BBC Crimewatch investigation clearly states that the person may be the kidnapper but also may have an innocent explanation.
Note that the only article that both the New York Times and Snopes cite about the McCann case is The Guardian's article which was written just before the airing of the Crimewatch video.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/14/british-detectives-efits-madeleine- mccann-suspect
14 October 2013
British detectives release efits of Madeleine McCann suspect
In an appeal to be broadcast on Monday night on BBC1's Crimewatch, Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood of the Metropolitan police will call for anyone who recognises the man to contact him immediately.
Crimewatch will be broadcast on BBC1 at 9pm on Monday.
Note that the Any Redwood is the same guy in the above video.
It is clear that the suspect may have been a kidnapper.
Was the suspect 1 man and was he between 20 to 40 years old?
Let's look at the actual witness statements, and not just the Guardian article.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm
1606 to 1610 Witness testimony of Martin Smith taken 2007/05/26 with map of sighting
ā¦he states that he arrived in Portugal on the 30th of April, 2007, with a booked return date of May 9, 2007.
ā¦he was Caucasian, around 175 to 180m in height. He appeared to be about 35/40 years old. He had an average build, a bit on the thin side. His hair was short, in a basic male cut, brown in colour. He cannot state if it was dark or lighter in tone. He did not wear glasses and had no beard or moustache. He did not notice any other relevant details partly due to the fact that the lighting was not very good.
States that it is not possible for him to recognise the individual in person or by photograph.
ā¦when he saw the individual he was accompanied by his wife, MARY SMITH, his son, PETER SMITH, his daughter-in-law, S, his grandchildren of 13 and 6 years of age (children of PETER) TA and CO**, his daughter AOIFE (12 years of age), and his other two grandchildren (AI****** (10 years old) and EI**** (four years old). These are children of his daughter B***** who was in Ireland.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm#p6p1611
1611 to 1614 Witness testimony of Aoife Smith taken 2007/05/26
ā¦states that probably she would not be able to recognise either the individual or the child.
ā¦the individual was male, Caucasian, light-skinned, between 20/30 years of age, of normal physical build, around 1,70/1,75 metres in height. At the time she saw his face but now cannot remember it.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm#p6p1615
1615 to 1624 Witness Testimony of Peter Daniel Smith taken 2007/05/26 with map of sighting
ā¦states that when he passed this individual it would have been around 21H55/22H00, and at the time he was completely unaware that a child had disappeared. He only found out about the disappearance of the child the next morning through someone he knew, the son of the builder of Estrela da Luz, who was also at the airport. The witness went to the airport given that, as planned, he intended to return to Ireland on that day
At that time he did not associate the said individual with the disappearance, only after thinking on the subject and the coincidence of the time did he infer that MADELEINE could have been the child carried by the individual that he had seen.
The description of the individual who carried the child was: Caucasian, around 175 to 180 cm tall. About 35 years, or older. He was somewhat tanned as a result of sun exposure. Average build, in good shape. Short hair, brown in colour. He does not remember if he wore glasses, or had a beard or a moustache. He did not notice any other relevant details as the lighting was bad.
States that it would not be possible to recognize the individual in person or via photograph.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/cctv-madeleine-mccann-snatcher-deleted-2467839
19 October 2013
CCTV of Madeleine McCann 'snatcher' was deleted before officers could get to it
The new prime suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann was probably caught on CCTV - but the film was wiped.
A man seen carrying a child around the time Madeleine vanished would have walked directly through a section of road that was covered by a camera.
But by the time Portuguese detectives spoke to the owners of the CCTV at the hotel Estrela da Luz, the film had been wiped.
Thus from the witness statements, it is clear that:
- The suspect is just one man.
- Martin and his son state the man was 35 to 40 years old.
- Martin's 12 year old daughter states the man was between 20/30 years old.
- NONE of the witnesses could recognize how the individual's face actually looked like.
Thus the Guardian article is misleading in stating the suspect was between 20-40 years old because the 20 years old number comes from a 12 year old child, while the two other older witnesses are much more reliable.
That being said, none of them even know how the person's face looked like and thus the question remains: How were the efits produced?
Martin Smith was in Portugal from April 30th to May 9th.
He contacted English police after seeing the news about McCann and then flew back to Portugal on May 26 to talk to police.
- Madeleine was reported missing on May 3rd.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/10391348/Madeleine- McCann-is-there-hope-at-last.html
19 October 2013
Madeleine McCann: is there hope at last?
Instead, detectives are now focusing their efforts on a second man seen carrying a child towards the beach just minutes before Kate McCann went to check on Madeleine. An Irishman, Martin Smith, and his wife reported seeing him at the time. Their e-fits, which have only now been released, were originally produced by a private detective agency which was hired by the McCanns in 2008 when they became dissatisfied with the Portuguese police inquiry.
http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/comment/regulars/corrections/article1357081.ece
28 December 2013
Kate and Gerry McCann and Madeleine's Fund
In articles dated October 27 ("Madeleine clues hidden for 5 years" and "Investigators had E-Fits five years ago", News) we referred to efits which were included in a report prepared by private investigators for the McCanns and the Fund in 2008. We accept that the articles may have been understood to suggest that the McCanns had withheld information from the authorities. This was not the case. We now understand and accept that the efits had been provided to the Portuguese and Leicestershire police by October 2009. We also understand that a copy of the final report including the efits was passed to the Metropolitan police in August 2011, shortly after it commenced its review. We apologise for the distress caused.
Thus the efits were made by private investigators in 2008, given to the Portuguese and Leicestershire police by 2009 and passed to the Metropolitan police in August 2011, and then finally shown to the public on October 2013 as part of the BBC Crimewatch TV program urging the public to find this manā¦ 6 YEARS AFTER Madeleine was reported missingā¦
Independent investigators have been skeptical for years about the efits.
1 July 2015
The Phantoms - 5 OF 5
I HIGHLY recommend watching all of Richard Hall's videos on the McCann case.
It is clear that the efits look like two men, and from two completely different computer programs.
Also, the Smith family's first statements to police state that they did not know how the man's face looked like and could not recognize him in a photograph.
Given that these efits took so long to be released, they appear to be fabricated.
Also, there is no video of the Smith family in any interview, and they have not responded to Richard Hall's inquiry for an interview, or to answer any questions regarding the McCann case.
19 April 2015
McCLIP - Wendy Murphy Former US Prosecutor "I'm not buying it.."
Wendy Murphy believes Madeleine is dead and all these suspects are fabricated.
Summary of #PizzaGate Part 4
The only accurate statement by Snopes and New York Times is that the Smith family were describing one man.
The only witness stating the man was less than 35 years old was a 12 year old child, which is less reliable than the two older witnesses.
But both Snopes and NY Times ignored the fact that John Podesta may have deleted emails prior to the McCann disappearance, and his assistant emailed on his behalf on the day after.
Snopes also falsely referenced an article stating Podestas were in Portugal at the time of Madeleine's disappearance, when that article merely stated that Portugal was a travel destination of the Podestas.
Snopes is wrong in stating that the suspect was not a possible kidnapper.
The witness testimonies make it clear that no one knew how the man looked like, so efits could not realistically have been made.
The efits look like two different people, on two different computer programs.
The timeline of the efits being produced raises even more questions:
- McCann disappearance reported in May 3, 2007.
- The Smith family tell police they couldn't identify the man on May 26, 2007.
- Efits produced by McCann's private investigators in 2008.
- Efits given to Portuguese and Leicestershire police by October 2009.
- Efits given to Scotland Yard in August 2011.
- Efits shown to the public (while not stating it was produced by the McCanns) on October 14, 2013.
Thus it appears that the efits most likely have been fabricated.
Thus, the production of the efits does not suggest that the Podesta brothers or any person had actually kidnapped Madeleine.
A more likely scenario is that Madeleine has been dead for quite some time and there is a massive cover-up going on, similar to the mainstream media coverage of #PizzaGate.
5 July 2015
The True Story of Madeleine McCann -1
I highly recommend you watch this documentary by Richard Hall that explores the McCann case in far greater detail than any mainstream media outlet.
But the question still remains, given that the efits appear to be fabricated, and that Snopes, New York Times, BBC, The Guardian, and other MSM news outlets, appear to be covering up the Madeleine McCann case, why do the efits look a lot like John and Tony Podesta?
- Also note the mole on Tony's forehead appears in the efit.
A possible scenario could be that the efits are used as blackmailā¦
Other possible scenarios, while assuming that Madeleine has been dead and not kidnapped are presented in this video:
23 November 2016
Madeleine McCann, The Podesta Brothers & Pizzagate
I recommend you watch this video to get an idea of possible reasons for the efits being produced in the first place.
But regardless of the possible scenarios, Snopes and New York Times are very large and powerful news outlets, so if they were really interested in finding the truth behind this, they can simply ask John Podesta because they have the power to get a response from him (he has not responded yet).
Citizen journalists are only just doing the job that mainstream media should be doing.
The fact that they aren't asking Podesta tells a lot about the mainstream media.
Now the real reason for the media appearing to cover up the McCann case might be because it, just like #PizzaGate, involves some of the most powerful people in the worldā¦
Stay Tuned for Part 5ā¦
Watch the rest of my ongoing #PizzaGate Video Series: https://mes.fm/pizzagate-voat