Josh, I know they call it Rewards on Steemit. However, it either is or should be a payment mechanism. Specifically, I mean, when a person upvotes, they are basically paying money, I mean cryptocurrencies that is pending from the rewards pool. Of course, we can upvote and downvote. We can flag. We can all do what we want. I'm not saying you can't. I don't downvote because I see the upvoting system as a free market system or at least a reverse auctioning system. Disagreeing with rewards would be like disagreeing on the price of a car that you are not going to buy in the first place. I guess you can do that. But if a bunch people and bots upvoted it, then it deserves the rewards, perhaps. That is supply and demand. That might be how the free market works at least in theory.
RE: Tulsi Gabbard is a Savage