Even if I agree with you that it was historically Indian. India has hundreds of ethnic groups so you have to define who actually owns the area. The Brits created the situation through imperialism. I don't disagree there. But again that's beyond the point. The central government of India which is run by a right winger who is backed by one ethnic group wants to forcibly migrate a group out of that area and replace it with another. So I'm against that.
Regardless of my personal opinion. I'm still going to cover it objectively.
RE: What's Going On In Kashmir? - A Primer