Sweden made the decision to reject mandatory vaccinations citing health concerns and the fact that it violates their peoples constitutional rights, where as in Australia they are actively celebrating the gradual erosion of their civil and human rights by embracing mandatory vaccinations.
A report was carried out on Swedens decision to reject mandatory vaccines and i have put some excerpts from that report below:
“NHF Sweden sent a letter to the Committee and explained that it would violate our Constitution if we introduced compulsory vaccinations, or mandatory vaccinations as was submitted in Arkelsten’s motion. Many others have also submitted correspondence and many citizens have called up Parliament and politicians. Parliamentary politicians has surely noticed that there’s a massive resistance to all forms of coercion with regard to vaccinations.
“NHF Sweden also shows how frequent serious adverse reactions according to the rate at which FASS specifies in the package leaflet of the MMR vaccine, when you vaccinate an entire year group. In addition, one must take into account that each age group will receive the MMR vaccine twice, so the side effects are doubled. We must not forget that, in addition, similar adverse reaction lists apply for other vaccines.
“In the letter, we have even included an extensive list of the additives found in vaccines – substances which are not health foods and certainly do not belong in babies or children. We also included for lawmakers a daunting list of studies that demonstrate vaccination is a bad idea.”
I feel that a lot of science is incomplete and think that also applies to the human body, just last year a new organ was discovered in the human body which goes to show science does not necessarily have all the answers though it is probably the best we have at the moment, i would just like to see people question these scientists a bit more.