RE: Name YOUR decentralized social network?

I have been busy on the 9/11 blogs. Have you read them? Quite detailed.

I happenstanced on the following linked very attractive webpage layout and design:

I’m now starting to get a little confused over […]

That’s the problem with having too many names.

I think we should simplify:

The Uncommons will have built-in DAPP functionality for a wiki encyclopedia, blogging, Q & A, debates and discussion forums.

I thinking perhaps we shouldn’t attempt to retain name recognition (i.e. brand) so many names. So I am leaning towards all that functionality above is put on the Uncommons.

Others can create DAPPs (such as Keeper and Immortal) and have them listed on the portal.

EDIT 4 days later: Also Oodles is a more catchy name than Uncommons, is only 2 syllables, would standout more in the list at coinmarketcap.com, perhaps is more matched as portal of oodles of DAPPs, conveys the enticing notion of “oddles of cred” and the unique onboarding design. Downside is that Oodles is less serious and prestigious.

Thus perhaps I prefer Oodles for the overarching project and portal name. And Uncommons only for the vetted DAPPs portal. However, it’s also tempting to discard Hyperdata and use only Uncommons for the project name, portal, and ledger technology name.