UPDATED 2021/11/12 (2) edits today

quoted text from
@dynamicgreentk/re-logiczombie-r3yf89
@dynamicgreentk/re-logiczombie-r3yf89

Again, I see what you are doing and I respect it as well as you. I recently had to engage and let my voice be heard as silence can be a killer. The situation has emerged to be a ugly one. both parties have valid points and are not able to see eye to eye because of posts like these where both parties are displaying ugly attitudes and no solutions to a situation that I think can be solved in a healthier way. ie proposals, olive branches and not constantly shoving ugly stuff in people's faces. Yes, morals and ethics are important and holding others accountable is key in a civilized society but so is healthy solutions. I do not think this post reflects a healthy solution or approach at this point. I would appreciate having the tags removed for this post for dynamicgreentk, dynamicsteemians and dynamichivers as I am looking forward to a new post from you that steers the conversation past highlighting ugly statements by all parties. I appreciate you and your hardwork. Keep up the good fight to be the change you wish to see in the world!

reply below

what exactly do you believe are the "valid points" that are being presented by "both parties" ?

i'll settle for just your top 3 from each side

(1)
(2)
(3)

what specific part of my writing do you consider "ugly attitudes" ?

(1)
(2)
(3)

writing proposals is great - but only the oligarchs have the votes to actually pass any proposals - they've raised the bar specifically to shut-down anyone who opposes them.

what "ugly stuff" (please be specific) is "constantly" being "shoved" "in people's faces" ?

(1)
(2)
(3)

here's a "healthy solution" which i've been promulgating

BURN THE REWARD-POOL - STOP GIVING DOWNVOTED REWARDS TO THE TOP EARNERS

the top earners are already doing quite well - they don't need any extra-gravy

burning the unspent reward-pool would still benefit the oligarchs MORE than anyone else (through dynamic deflation) - BUT - it would also benefit ALL STAKEHOLDERS proportional to their investment

the downvoting vigilantes already claim they don't do it for the money

so why not burn the unspent reward-pool ?

everyone absolutely loves a burn post

free movie of the week
https://tubitv.com/movies/321246/zeitgeist-moving-forward?start=true
[SKIPTO2993SECONDS]

[SKIPTO2993SECONDS]

@stoodkev - please consider reviewing your witness votes

@stoodkev - i noticed that you UPVOTED the following post that includes this comment

@tlavagabond/catherine-austin-fitts-interview-global-financial-coup-d-etat-and-technocratic-slavery-that-follows
@tlavagabond/catherine-austin-fitts-interview-global-financial-coup-d-etat-and-technocratic-slavery-that-follows

@stoodkev - @acidyo aka @ocd is spearheading a public campaign to drive AWAY any content creators whom they happen to disagree with politically

@ura-soul has been heavily targeted

@v4vapid - why are you apologizing to these bullies ?

there's a great scene in the first season of this show, where the bullies take over, and instead of beating the girl who defied their made-up "rules" - they instead make her publicly apologize for what she did "wrong"

Step one: scare all your critics into NOT VOTING (so nobody "opposes you")

Step two: convince people who might vote for lower ranked witnesses that they "don't understand" the technical aspects and or they need to do "more research"

Step three: vote for yourself and claim "the community supports me"

@trostparadox -

@trostparadox - maybe try voting for 30 witnesses that ARE NOT DOWNVOTING @URA-SOUL ??

@trostparadox - delegating your hive-power does NOT diminish your WITNESS VOTE

hold on a second, are you renting a delegation from @theycallmedan ?

or is that a gift ?

@trostparadox/wallet
@trostparadox/wallet

UPDATED 2021/10/12 (2) edits today

acid responds to his self-votes -

@kennyskitchen/re-acidyo-r3wzmw

@kennyskitchen/re-acidyo-r3wzmw

i'm pretty certain it's NOT the stated mission of @ocd and @ocdb to protect @acidyo from downvotes

try curating some "high-quality-original-content" (not written by someone who controls the curation trail)

how many undiscovered writers missed out on that $27.00ish HIVE ?

whatever happened to your assertion that "downvotes are no big deal" and everyone should just stop complaining ?

see who has figured out how to use the MUTE function
https://www.cutehive.com/muted.php

see who is super proud of their first flag
https://nftshowroom.com/themarkymark/gallery/themarkymark_just-being-marky_markys-first-flag

link of the week - -
@stopthemarkymark/re-k7m8onea-20200311t001010
@stopthemarkymark/re-k7m8onea-20200311t001010
link of the week - -

https://hive-together.herokuapp.com/intersections?accounts%5B%5D=acidyo&accounts%5B%5D=ocd&accounts%5B%5D=&intersections_size=8&limit=1000&only_replies=false&start=601000

more detail
https://www.hive-now.com/@acidyo

UPDATED 2021/05/12 (3) edits today

reply to - @barge - @barge/re-barge-r3nau8

@barge, phenomenal reply by the way - a true masterpiece

[SKIPTO30SECONDS]
"the person winning in monopoly is never the person flipping the board"

"the person winning in monopoly is never the person flipping the board"
[SKIPTO30SECONDS]

when they say "stop talking about downvotes" -

a "safe archive spot" would be https://blurt.blog and or https://odysee.com and or https://blurtworld.com/

@j85063 - please consider reviewing your witness votes - you retain all of your witness and proposal vote power - even if you delegate all your hive power to someone else - delegation does not give them your witness and proposal votes

please consider voting for these free-speech witnesses

@aizensou
@altonos
@bethalea
@c0ff33a
@cadawg
@complexring
@disregardfiat
@drakos
@earn.hive
@enginewitty
@fernandosoder
@hagie
@helo
@jamzed
@jedigeiss
@kristall97
@lapingvino
@liondani
@mintrawa
@oflyhigh
@patrice
@perfilbrasil
@shmoogleosukami
@steemychicken1
@tazi
@techcoderx
@thealliance
@ura-soul
@whiterosecoffee
@yehey

@j85063 - you are currently voting for the following BIG DOWNVOTERS

first they came for the "flat-earthers", and i did not speak out - because the planet is obviously an oblate-spheroid...

then they came for the "conspiracy-theorists", and i did not speak out - because i really don't stick my neck out for "lunatics"

then they came for the "pro-VOLUNTARY-vaxxers", and i did not speak out - because i generally like to "stay out of politics" generally

by the time they came for the independent-minded-free-thinking-skeptics, there was nobody left - are you kidding me ? those free-thinkers never join anything or listen to anyone !!! - they're super easy to pick-off one by one.

UPDATED 2021/04/12

ALSO,

quoted text from - @ truthforce (who doesn't want to be tagged)

For the record, since you are slandering me now.

kenny and truthforce have the same attitude that azircon and acidyo have

No, I really don't. I have upvoted everything they have downvoted dozens maybe even a 100 times by now with our curation trail. Not even close.

"you better respect me because i control a big curation trail"

I have never said ANYTHING close to such a statement, anywhere. In fact, i've literaly never made the Informationwar about me at all. I don't make posts about how great I am or anything egotistical AT ALL about the effort. I'm extremely low key about the entire effort. If you respect what I have accomplished over 1000 hours of time spent on the project over 4 years that's fine, if you don't then I don't care. I don't care at all if you respect me one bit, or if anyone does. My accomplishments speak for themselves and I don't need anyone trying to inflate my sense of self worth.

i didn't "doxx" anyone - there was zero personal information in that conversation
i could have "paraphrased" the conversation - but why ?

There was personal information in the conversation, someone's private words written just to you, not to the public. If you want to make a private conversation public you need to ask for permission from the other party. It shows you had bad moral character by not doing so.

please explain exactly which part of the conversation in question violated some specific moral principle ?
please explain exactly what you think i "did wrong"

Violating privacy of someone.
Causing conflict with me and Kenny(long time direct supporter of IW) and other IW people, as I vouched for you by allowing you to join our discord and elevated you to a higher rank so you could participate in higher level discussions. You then abused that priveledge by making it all about yourself, everything you ever typed in our server was about you 100% of the time.
Mass messaging everyone on the Informationwar Discord, so that you can take screenshots of people's conversations and publicly post them for your personal vendetta and use it, while not even caring how that could get them targeted by whales or hurt the effort.
Not caring the people that you hurt by doing this, you clearly don't care at all about who you hurt with your actions(you're hurting people by going about this the way you are going about it)
I've told you before what you are doing is making a target rich list for whales to downvote, they can see all those people you tagged and just open up their profiles and start downvoting them. You provided them on a silver platter a huge list they can use to blacklist not and add auto downvotes to.

Your approach is totally wrong because you are now hurting us, who you apparently "claim" as allies. We aren't your allies anymore. You caused us to lose HP support on curation trail and our upvote effort has now been diminished because you want to make everything about yourself and tag spam people daily.

reply to - @ truthforce (who doesn't want to be tagged)

saying you have the same attitude as acidyo and azircon is NOT slander
an attitude is not a crime
an attitude is not a belief system
you ARE being reactive and blaming me for kenny's reaction
kenny is blaming you for what i did
do you see how this is ridiculous ?

we are completely independent actors

we are not the same person

you are not responsible for my actions

i am not responsible for your actions

if you had a "problem" with what i was posting in informationwar -

YOU SHOULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING

i'm not a mind-reader

and you claim that "i only posted about myself" - please provide screenshots

i never talk about myself personally unless someone asks me a direct question

i always post what i am interested in

and your claim that i was "spamming" ALL your informationwar subscribers is verifiably FALSE

i sent friend requests to maybe five people who i recognized

and when maybe two people accepted the friend request - i sent them stuff

only one person asked me to stop sending stuff and i never bothered them again

YOU CAN'T EXPECT PEOPLE TO FOLLOW "UNWRITTEN RULES"

AND - as far as creating a "target list" - my subscribers are already public knowledge and the people who upvoted this post are already public knowledge - so - i'm not sure what your point is

@acidyo and @azircon have already targeted you

their vendetta was not caused by me - i do not control them

AND - perhaps you and kenny never said the exact words - "you better respect me because i control a big curation trail"

you and kenny certainly act like you can make demands on me - as if i "owe" you something

which is pretty much what @usainvote said - "how ungrateful"

which is pretty much what kenny said to @tonysayers33

quoted text from - @barge

@logiczombie
I can't call 'right' or 'wrong'. I can rewind and tell you what my feelings were at the time.

It had the feeling of a betrayal of trust – that's basically it. I generally dig KK's take on life/spirituality/pLandemic etc and I felt he was being open and even trusting with you – answering who the big delegator was etc, and stating why he didn't want to spend energy in a negative d/v campaign as suggested. I know that you consider everything you post to be for anyone to use freely and it felt as if you had applied that to the conversation with KK in a way that pushed it too far ie that you had taken advantage.

I take your point that the delegator is public info readily available. That had not occurred to me in the state of consciousness where I was dismayed that you'd do something like that and thinking how I might feel if that had happened to me.

It did feel a bit like an attack on KK – I think it's likely he will have taken it as such. Perhaps there are elements of KK (and TF?) having aspects of HivePOWER go to their heads in the sense of that being a motivation to action that serves Ego rather than Other – I don't know and can't say. But I have heard both speak out in support of stuff that aligns with me and haven't observed the kind of violence of approach that would make me wanna distance myself. It feels as if you are being harsh on them. I do respect your sense of purpose and although I better understand now where you are coming from, it still seems as if the content of the update was rather divisive in intent and effect.

You are right that you didn't doxx anyone and that there was no personal info. My initial reaction did move in that direction I have to admit, and KK's response ('disgusting') suggests the same. I do accept that that is/was an overreaction based on emotions and not logic :).

Ya, it's not black'n'white. I seem to remember you posting an exchange with Azircon but that came from a public server. Is that different? I think so and not because of the personalities involved. I admit I'm struggling to pinpoint what exactly it is that still feels uncomfy about screenshotting the DM convo without consent (indeed, as opposed to paraphrasing)...perhaps that it was clearly to be considered private (tacitly understood by both parties) – would you agree that such an understanding would be the default? And if so, then it is here that the violation takes place. I'd say that at the least – and perhaps no more than that – you disrespected KK through your action and this was not provoked or (to my eyes anyhow, even now upon re-reflection) justified.

There you have it bro!

reply to - @barge

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_Gyges

UPDATED 2021/03/12

reply to - @barge

kenny and truthforce have the same attitude that azircon and acidyo have

"you better respect me because i control a big curation trail"

i didn't "doxx" anyone - there was zero personal information in that conversation

i could have "paraphrased" the conversation - but why ?

please explain exactly which part of the conversation in question violated some specific moral principle ?

please explain exactly what you think i "did wrong"

UPDATED 2021/02/12

CRITIQUE = RESPECT

@jamesc - please consider reviewing your witness votes - you retain all of your witness and proposal vote power - even if you delegate all your hive power to someone else - delegation does not give them your witness and proposal votes

@ctime - thank you for your proxy

CRITIQUE = RESPECT

@xeldal - please consider reviewing your witness votes - please also consider adding @drakos to your 29/30 witness votes - you retain all of your witness and proposal vote power - even if you delegate all your hive power to someone else - delegation does not give them your witness and proposal votes

CRITIQUE = RESPECT

@enki - please consider reviewing your witness votes - each and every account has exactly 30 witness votes assigned - UNUSED witness votes are de facto votes for the oligarchy - you retain all of your witness and proposal vote power - even if you delegate all your hive power to someone else - delegation does not give them your witness and proposal votes

UPDATED 2021/28/11

@sunlit7/q4rs8h
@sunlit7/q4rs8h

THE MILKERS AND THE STEEM GATEKEEPERS

@nonsowrites/the-milkers-and-the-steem-gatekeepers
@nonsowrites/the-milkers-and-the-steem-gatekeepers

Comparison Video that Was Removed TWICE from YouTube

We all know Bernie Sanders is a cocksucker, please shit the fuck up now! @highimpactflix Why can’t I open the full live stream of this event on your page anymore?! It says downvoted by Dtube, is it removed from here now? I literally just signed up for this bullshit to upvote that fucking video! Goddamn liberal cunts, please correct me if I’m weong an I can still find the video I mean not libyards “politically correct” me j/s

@highimpactflix/fahs4mz0
@highimpactflix/fahs4mz0

how can you claim to be any different than Facebook, and the other CENSORSHIP sites?

@mepatriot/jz3nh-look-at-my-blog-steemit-seriously-how-can-you-claim-to-be-any-different-than-facebook-and-the-other-censorship-sites?sort=trending
@mepatriot/jz3nh-look-at-my-blog-steemit-seriously-how-can-you-claim-to-be-any-different-than-facebook-and-the-other-censorship-sites?sort=trending

The Disproportionate Power Balance with Downvotes

@bengy/steem-the-disproportionate-power-balance-with-downvotes
@bengy/steem-the-disproportionate-power-balance-with-downvotes

DOWNVOTE EARLY, DOWNVOTE OFTEN

@logiczombie/downvote-early-downvote-often
@logiczombie/downvote-early-downvote-often

DOWNVOTED FOR NOT DOWNVOTING ENOUGH OTHER PEOPLE

@livinguktaiwan/i-got-downvoted-because-i-don-t-downvote-people
@livinguktaiwan/i-got-downvoted-because-i-don-t-downvote-people

DOWNVOTED FOR USING PUBLIC DOMAIN IMAGES FROM WIKIPEDIA

@yetaras/my-steemcleaners-blacklist-my-apology-to-the-steem-community#@cranium/re-yetaras-2020127t84034577z
@yetaras/my-steemcleaners-blacklist-my-apology-to-the-steem-community#@cranium/re-yetaras-2020127t84034577z

reply to @amaterasusolar - skip to 711 seconds

[SKIPTO711SECONDS]

[SKIPTO711SECONDS]

quoted text from @ dynamicgreentk · 2 hours ago

Ok, I guess I had to come back for more. Seeing as I perceive you as a intelligent person, I had to read the updates today for this I'm mad ass hell post...

There is a whole world of Hive DMs, secret projects, "ethical hackers" and I will go out on a limb and say Dan, Ned and Sun are still influencing big time. People wanna taunt Sun or brag about having more HP than @ned and even thinking @dan is busy working away on EOS and not influencing Hive still with secret accounts or posts about how we should stop accepting rewards on posts from the rewards pool:

Lastly, anyone building anything that results in economic profit and loss imposes tax consequences on their users. Tokens like Voice or Hive create tax events every time they change hands. This is why I decline rewards when I post on Hive, they are not worth the tax accounting. With the growing sophistication of the tax authorities and the loss of privacy, none of these token-based ecosystems / platforms stand a chance unless they automatically do all of the tax calculations and boil it down to a 1099. The only way to automate such calculations is to have full knowledge of every purchase price and sale price. Such things are not possible if users are trading on multiple exchanges in a decentralized manner.

@dan/what-s-next-for-eos-eth-and-btc

Ultimately, I can see the rewards pool being eliminated or morphed into something else as we become a more robust Chain that with each day outperforms Cardano and pretty much any web 3.0 competitor.

Not sure if we really do have 30 witnesses, if they do simply just vote on themselves to maintain ranking in top 30 or if they are out of date boomers blindly following orders from Dan and who totally slept on the NFT craze and now is sleeping on the metaverse with the exception of course of @aggroed and @dlux-io.

Ok, almost done with coffee and now why I really came here to say what I meant to say.

In my almost 4 years on Hive there has been two accounts I have kept my eyes on as I have been hyper critical of and they have proven to be some extremely solid people who is building communities and doing great things.

One was @neoxian, in 2018 when I created @ dynamicsteemians lots of people in my group was receiving loans from him. I was concerned because the price of Steem was volatile but his community is extremely rich now 3 years later and he has brought a lot out of poverty worldwide. Truly some cool shit that man has done for Hivians over the years and now. I have explored many many communities on Hive and Neoxian's is the most polite and loving community too.

The other person was @theycallmedan. I have been a houseboy (no not gay) for multi-millionaires, worked for them and have been their right hand man. Not often will you find a multi-millionaire take pride in pouring millions into an investment that was on a downturn in steem as it was crashing and Ned was selling off his steem for a buck.

TheycallmeDan was not a legacy investor and truly wanted to build on Steem/Hive. He really does have vision and a long term goal. He was screwed by Ned in my opinion, as Ned was driving down the price of Steem in order to sell to Sun so he can retreat to his Epstein island with his Epstein friends, who are the Steem legacy investors who were not international poker players. Theycallmedan will bring the investors that will further support the @deepdives community and overall anti-goberment content on Hive and somehow this man crafted a brilliant proposal and network to incentivize further support on memes and conspiracy content while paying mind to current trends like NFTs and blockchain gaming.